0:00
All right, good afternoon everybody. Um,
0:02
thanks for joining us this afternoon uh
0:05
for this afternoon's housing development
0:07
fund webinar uh where we'll be
0:08
discussing this summer's RFP cycle.
0:16
Okay. Um, first just want to do some
0:18
brief introductions. Uh, my name is
0:19
Michael Inglehart. I'm the housing trust
0:21
fund manager here at the city of
0:22
Charlotte and I'm joined by my
0:24
colleagues Harold Thompson and Leslie
0:26
Blazer as well as Janine Simmons our
0:28
housing admin. Uh first I just want to
0:31
point out if you have any technical
0:32
difficulties please communicate via the
0:34
chat. Uh however please don't be
0:36
stressed. A recording and transcript
0:38
will be p will be posted in the days
0:40
that follow. Um another note if you have
0:43
any questions throughout the
0:44
presentation please drop those in the
0:46
chat. You can put those in at any point
0:47
in time. um we will hold uh on answers
0:50
until the Q&A, but you are welcome to
0:52
put those in um as they come up and
0:55
please don't hesitate.
0:57
So on today's agenda, we're going to go
0:59
through the background of the housing
1:00
trust fund. We're going to walk through
1:02
the process and schedule, review some
1:04
eligibility criteria, and then perhaps
1:06
most importantly for any returnees is go
1:08
over what's new in the housing trust
1:10
fund or in the housing development fund
1:12
RFP, and then we'll wrap up with a Q&A.
1:18
So, I think this presentation will be
1:20
fairly short and brief. Um, so we can
1:22
spend most of our time with any
1:24
questions and and answers that that
1:25
folks may have.
1:27
So, just as background, um, the housing
1:30
trust fund was created in 2001, uh,
1:32
which is the city's primary tool for
1:34
creating and preserving affordable
1:36
housing across the city of Charlotte.
1:38
This includes rental, home ownership,
1:39
and supportive housing. Um, it is voted,
1:44
I'm sorry, it is funded by voter
1:45
approved affordable housing bonds and
1:47
this typically occurs every two years.
1:50
City's investments are leveraged with
1:51
private sector funds through
1:52
partnerships with developers. These for
1:55
multif family uh rental purposes, these
1:57
frequently include the low-income
1:59
housing tax credits.
2:01
Uh since 2002, uh whenever we first
2:04
started making our initial awards, we've
2:06
invested around $300 million and have
2:08
funded uh well over 14,000 units in
2:11
shelter beds. We're we're quickly
2:14
approaching 15,000 actually and expect
2:16
to hit that after this round.
2:21
Uh so just to go over the proposal
2:23
review process. Uh in phase one we
2:26
announce the RFP and then once
2:27
applications are received we notify city
2:29
council and initiate our review of
2:31
proposals. About 45 days later summaries
2:34
are sent to city council with with our
2:37
recommendations. From there it's
2:39
entirely in city council's court for uh
2:41
funding decisions.
2:43
After that, uh once fund awards are
2:46
made, we we uh negotiate or not
2:48
negotiate, we we work directly with
2:51
development partners to um finalize any
2:54
terms of our agreements before moving
2:56
into financial closing and then
2:58
construction and monitoring.
3:04
So, the schedule for this summer's
3:06
round, uh the RFP was posted on June
3:08
13th. We are hosting the webinar today
3:10
on June 23rd. And most critically, the
3:13
application submission deadline is July
3:15
25th, 2025. So about a month and a few
3:19
days uh out from today's date.
3:22
Um
3:24
after after uh submissions are are
3:27
received, uh we then work uh we being
3:30
the housing and neighborhood services
3:31
department work closely with our friends
3:33
over in planning to review both the
3:35
application as well as the sketch plans
3:37
that are submitted. Um over the next few
3:40
months that follow, we work, like I
3:42
said, closely with those folks. Uh go
3:44
over any questions and concerns that we
3:46
have with developers
3:48
before culminating in our presentations
3:50
to city council. Uh the date for the
3:52
first city council meeting this summer's
3:54
round is actually in fall, October 13th,
3:57
2025. Uh it was expected city council
4:00
approval occurring on October 27th,
4:02
2025.
4:05
Uh if you participated in last winter's
4:08
round, you may have you may notice that
4:10
there is uh something missing from the
4:11
schedule, which is the presubmitt
4:12
meetings. Uh we did attempt to host
4:14
those last winter. However, due to the
4:17
unprepedented level of demand for the
4:20
the housing development fund, uh we were
4:22
unable to accommodate those meetings and
4:24
so we have dropped that from this
4:25
summer's schedule. Um, however, we would
4:27
we would greatly encourage you to um
4:30
reach out to our planning staff to
4:32
discuss any any questions or concerns
4:34
you may have just to ensure that you're
4:36
up to date with any of the of the new
4:38
design ordinances.
4:42
So, high level eligibility, uh, we have
4:44
three eligible activities which are
4:47
multif family new construction or res
4:49
renovation, single family new
4:51
construction or supportive housing
4:53
renovation and new construction. A
4:55
couple of ineligible activities that
4:57
we're not able to fund through the
4:58
housing trust fund or the housing
4:59
development fund are projects under
5:01
construction
5:03
acquisition um see Noah and TOD RFPs and
5:06
I will I will talk briefly about those
5:09
at the conclusion of today's event and
5:11
then any project outside the scope of
5:13
the RFP.
5:18
So looking at that first eligible
5:19
activity, multif family development. Um
5:21
in short, we provide gap financing to
5:23
both nonprofit and for-profit developers
5:25
for the purposes of affordable housing
5:27
development. We have flexible
5:28
structuring. It's typically soft
5:30
funding. Um flexible subordinate loans.
5:34
One of the the keystones of of this
5:37
program is the 20% of the units must be
5:39
targeted to families earning up to 30%
5:42
of the area median income.
5:46
Uh and then next the priorities for this
5:48
this category, this funding category,
5:51
transit accessible areas or those within
5:53
resourcerich neighborhoods,
5:56
those that offer resident services that
5:58
enhance stability and opportunity such
6:00
as workforce development, healthcare or
6:02
financial wellness. And this is
6:04
indicated through um the level of of
6:07
resident services that are provided at
6:08
the site andor partnerships that are
6:10
established uh through the development.
6:13
And then lastly, those that include
6:14
larger unit sizes to accommodate
6:16
families. Uh we see a lot of studios and
6:18
ones and twos. Um but we're also uh
6:21
strongly supportive of those with three
6:23
or four. So those three kind of uh make
6:26
up our prioritizations for multif family
6:28
development.
6:32
Next, under single family development,
6:34
this funding is provided as either a
6:35
construction subsidy or down payment
6:37
assistance. Units must be destricted and
6:39
remain affordable for no less than 15
6:41
years.
6:43
Um and then just to take a step back for
6:45
the multif family, there is also a deed
6:46
restriction requirement. I believe that
6:48
year that uh threshold is is 50 years.
6:51
Um but I will go back and double check
6:52
that, but I I believe it's now 50 years.
6:56
And then our priorities for single
6:57
family development is the targeting of
6:59
households at 80% of the area median
7:01
income or below with an emphasis on
7:03
entry- level buyers and first generation
7:05
home buyers.
7:07
Uh we're we're looking to prioritize
7:09
those that incorporate innovative
7:11
ownership models, whether it's shared
7:13
equity, community land trusts, or some
7:15
other innovative approach to um the
7:18
ownership question. Uh we're we're we're
7:20
supportive of exploring u new
7:22
possibilities there and give those those
7:24
applicants prioritization.
7:26
And then next, sustainable building
7:28
practice practices and a focus on high
7:31
impact areas.
7:34
And then the third category, the last
7:36
category here, supportive housing. Uh to
7:38
be eligible for this category, you must
7:39
meet the you must be a continuum of care
7:42
recognized supportive housing need and
7:43
must be meeting a continuum of care
7:46
supportive housing need in the
7:47
community. Uh apologize for the fumble
7:49
there. Uh so this is homelessness,
7:51
mental health, justice involvement, etc.
7:54
Must be a nonprofit owner and operated
7:58
and must include appropriate supportive
7:59
services for whichever housing need you
8:02
are you are meeting. The priorities in
8:04
this category are comprehensive
8:06
supportive services on site or through
8:08
partnerships, creating mixed income
8:10
environments to foster inclusive
8:12
communities where supportive housing
8:13
units are integrated within broader
8:15
developments, and then those that are
8:17
strategically located in areas with
8:19
access to health care, social services,
8:21
and transit. And depending on the type
8:23
of of uh population you are serving,
8:27
access to any um amenities or resources
8:31
that would prove beneficial to those
8:32
groups. So, for instance, if you're
8:34
supporting uh veterans, you know, access
8:36
to the VA, for instance,
8:42
and then what's new. Um, so if you um
8:45
were not a participant in last winter's
8:47
round, there have been some fairly
8:49
substantial changes to the housing
8:50
development fund RFP. Um, really
8:54
stemming from September 2024's
8:57
affordable housing funding policy that
8:58
was issued by city council. And so we'll
9:01
walk through a little bit of of those
9:02
changes and how they impact the RFP that
9:04
is that is now out there. So again, the
9:07
focus a new emphasis on outcomes beyond
9:10
unit counts and cost per unit. Uh, of
9:13
course, we're still mindful of the
9:14
financial components of of applications,
9:16
but we're also taking a much more
9:18
holistic approach in terms of looking
9:20
at, you know, the quality of of
9:22
development, not necessarily just the
9:24
quantity of of the financial piece.
9:27
And then next is an updated set of
9:29
preferences and priorities which are
9:31
outlined in the RFP.
9:33
Um the first one I would point out here
9:35
is an expanded focus again on areas of
9:38
opportunity and residential stability.
9:40
So again, prioritization of those
9:41
projects in high opportunity
9:43
neighborhoods and those that offer
9:44
stronger tenant protections regarding
9:46
rental increases as an example.
9:51
Some others um we are looking to
9:53
prioritize capacity building
9:55
partnerships. So those that are um you
9:58
know perhaps working with smaller
10:00
developers to get them uh involved in
10:02
the development ecosystem here in
10:05
Charlotte. Um this also includes any of
10:07
our work with the through the faith and
10:09
housing initiative if you're familiar
10:11
with that. If not, I'd be happy to chat
10:12
with you folks about that offline. Um
10:15
but really looking to build these
10:16
capacity building partnerships that
10:18
enhance um the affordable housing
10:21
development ecosystem here in Charlotte.
10:23
And then next, you've you've probably
10:25
seen this pop up in some recent RFPs,
10:27
but a local preference policy. Uh we
10:29
have been working with NCHFA
10:31
specifically for the multif family
10:33
development piece. Um we've been working
10:35
with NCHFA to uh create guard rails and
10:38
guidelines for what that would look
10:39
like. And so that is really coming
10:42
coming to fruition here. Um and we're
10:44
expecting to be rolled out uh through
10:46
this RFP. And really what that entails
10:49
is a a set number of units that are set
10:51
aside for a community-based waiting
10:54
list.
10:57
And then next uh this is new even was
11:00
not included in the winter RFP but has
11:02
been new for this summer's round which
11:04
is an energy efficiency bonus. So really
11:07
looking to build off of the work through
11:09
the strategic energy action plan put out
11:11
by the city. And so as part of that, the
11:13
city uh housing trust fund and housing
11:15
development fund will be offering a
11:17
bonus of up to 10% above the requested
11:19
gap financing amount for projects that
11:21
demonstrate energy efficiency measures
11:23
that exceed those base level
11:24
requirements, be it by NCHFA or the
11:28
state of North Carolina. If you're
11:30
interested in that, there is a section
11:31
in the application where you can
11:33
indicate as such and we will uh work
11:35
with you to determine your eligibility
11:37
for that category or for that that
11:39
prioritization.
11:43
And then of course we have some revised
11:45
evaluation criteria again building off
11:47
that affordable housing funding policy.
11:49
Uh specifically changes in our scoring
11:51
methodology and developer eligibility.
11:53
Uh first is a stronger evaluation
11:55
criteria on long-term affordability and
11:57
economic mobility impact. So you can see
11:59
that demonstrated through the increased
12:02
prioritization of resident services and
12:04
also the extended affordability periods
12:06
that are now part of the housing
12:08
development fund RFP.
12:10
Next is eligibility limits for
12:12
developers with delayed projects just to
12:14
ensure timely delivery. Uh if you have
12:16
an active commitment letter with the
12:18
city would not be concerned. Um if if
12:22
some of those dates have begun to slip
12:23
or you have an expired commitment
12:25
letter, please reach out and we'll we'd
12:27
be happy to discuss.
12:29
And then next is prioritization for
12:31
innovative ownership models. Mentioned
12:32
this before under the single family
12:34
doesn't necessarily apply just to that.
12:36
Um and there's a number of ways that
12:38
that can take shape.
12:40
And then again a focus on larger units
12:42
for families. Uh that is a a continued
12:44
focus of the of the RFP. And then
12:46
lastly, an expanded evaluation of
12:48
property management practices.
12:54
And then new this round, this round
12:56
specifically is we have a new
12:58
application. And so uh what this
13:00
document does it it's an attempt to
13:02
consolidate the applica application
13:04
materials that we've previously had. So
13:07
uh we have combined the developer
13:09
application, the development data sheet,
13:10
the city proforma and the single family
13:12
workbook into one unified document.
13:16
Again, this is uh a new document. So if
13:18
you run into any questions or challenges
13:20
with that, please do not hesitate to
13:22
reach out. Um I built that document out,
13:24
so I'd be happy to work with you
13:25
directly to troubleshoot any challenges
13:27
you may be you may have. Uh but I think
13:30
it's it's fairly straightforward and
13:31
builds really off of the development
13:32
data sheet, just in a more expanded way.
13:35
Of course, just want to note that
13:37
applicants would still be required to
13:38
submit the supporting documentation that
13:40
is outlined in the RFP, but as far as
13:43
direct direct from the city
13:45
documentation, we have consolidated into
13:47
that one document.
13:51
And then I'm also excited to announce
13:52
that coming soon we will have two
13:54
additional RFPs uh posted. One being the
13:57
rolling home ownership RFP. And so this
13:59
is really just taking our home ownership
14:01
and de not decoupling it per se because
14:04
you're still eligible to apply for home
14:05
ownership activities under this umbrella
14:08
RFP. Uh but we will have a separate a
14:10
separate rolling home ownership RFP um
14:13
in order to facilitate additional home
14:15
ownership production across around year
14:17
round.
14:18
And then next you may have noticed that
14:20
the no acquisition RFP had been taken
14:22
down briefly. That was just to tune that
14:24
up and get it in line with the
14:25
affordable housing funding policy. and
14:28
that will be updated and posted. Uh we
14:30
are anticipating both of those being
14:31
posted by July 1, 2025.
14:35
And with that, I think we have wrapped
14:38
up today's presentation. Uh but we can
14:40
now turn it over to Q&A.
14:46
Thanks, Michael. I don't see any
14:47
questions in the chat or in Q&A quite
14:50
yet, but um let's see. We do have a hand
14:54
raise. I don't think you will be able to
14:56
talk in this uh webinar but if you would
14:59
like just drop your question into the
15:01
chat or the Q&A section.
15:04
Okay
15:07
says let's see here
15:10
what does it mean for what does this
15:12
mean for small developments Michael?
15:16
Yeah great question. So for small
15:17
developments um so the RFP does outline
15:20
um minimum
15:23
development sizes uh for multif family
15:25
development I believe that is at 40
15:27
units uh for home ownership uh we we
15:31
typically don't fund oneoff uh you know
15:33
homes for instance uh I think kind of
15:36
this the lowest we've gone in the past
15:37
is about five units and so for smaller
15:40
developments we do have other funding
15:42
opportunities uh specifically through
15:43
our home funding RFP which is more
15:46
targeted towards smaller scale
15:48
development. And so first I would point
15:50
you towards that. Uh but second, if
15:52
you're if you're asking more so along
15:54
the lines of like smaller development
15:55
entities, um what we're really looking
15:57
to do through that capacity building
15:59
preference is to provide smaller scale
16:02
developers an opportunity to work with
16:04
uh more established developers in the in
16:07
this realm in order to uh bring them up
16:09
to speed with the RFP for instance and
16:12
or provide just any capacity building
16:14
initi efforts to get them involved in
16:17
the real estate development game.
16:20
Okay. And if that doesn't if I was not
16:22
able to answer your question, Miss
16:23
Haynes, please don't hesitate to reach
16:25
out to me. I'm happy to to set up a call
16:27
or chat with you afterwards.
16:30
Cool. Uh Rachel and Alexis had a similar
16:33
question. Uh what is high impact housing
16:36
or a high impact area?
16:40
Yeah, great question. So, um we we look
16:42
at that from a number of different
16:43
angles, right? So, there's a number of
16:45
different geographic um goals, if you
16:48
will, across the city. And so really
16:51
taking a look at those the variety of um
16:55
plans and maps that we have across the
16:57
city. Uh so for instance, you know, of
16:59
course, council district 6 and 7 are
17:01
always target geographies uh and will
17:04
remain as such. Uh we also have a to RF
17:06
or I'm sorry, TOD preference and then
17:09
also areas that are experiencing uh
17:11
gentrification or neighborhood turnover.
17:14
So, um, if you have any specific
17:16
locations in mind, I hate to keep saying
17:18
this, but please don't hesitate to reach
17:20
out to me. I'm happy to walk through
17:21
those with you. Um, but yeah, I mean
17:24
that that in a in a nutshell, I would
17:26
say those are kind of the big three. Um,
17:28
but again, happy to chat with you about
17:31
any specific properties that you're
17:33
you're you're inquiring about.
17:37
Thanks, Michael. Uh, Scott asks, "The
17:40
energy efficiency bonus criteria are
17:42
somewhat vague. Can you provide examples
17:46
as to what can specifically be done to
17:49
qualify for the 10% bonus?"
17:52
Yeah, absolutely. So, this is this is a
17:54
new one for the RFP and it's something
17:56
that we're kind of putting out there as
17:57
a pilot, if you will. And so, what I
18:00
would encourage you to do is take a look
18:01
at the language that's included within
18:02
the RFP. So, um, it can include a
18:05
variety of of different things, whether
18:07
it's building, uh, I'm sorry, building
18:08
envelope, um, energy efficient
18:11
appliances that go above and beyond what
18:13
would necessarily be required by NCHFA,
18:16
but it's really just looking to take
18:18
energy efficiency to to the next level
18:20
compared to what is required by whether
18:23
law, statute, or guidelines from other
18:24
funding sources. So, um, I', like I
18:27
said, be happy to chat with you if you
18:29
have any questions about specific things
18:31
that you're considering.
18:33
Um, and yeah, we'd be we'd be more than
18:35
happy to chat through those to kind of
18:36
determine eligibility.
18:39
Okay. Miss Haynes had a follow-up
18:41
question. Uh, she says, "We've been
18:43
encouraged to work with larger
18:45
developers, but I'd like to know what
18:47
that looks like. We already own our
18:49
property, so we only want to rehab and
18:52
expand what we have and implement an
18:54
equity-based structure." I hope you can
18:56
understand this question. Yeah, that's a
18:59
great question. I think I would I would
19:00
recommend reaching out to me directly
19:02
just to chat through the specifics of of
19:04
what you're looking at. I apologize that
19:05
we don't have the ability to just
19:06
interact directly here. Um but I'd be
19:09
happy to chat through that with you. Uh
19:11
based on kind of what you're saying, I
19:12
think there may be some opportunities
19:13
through some of our other RFPs. Not to
19:15
say you shouldn't consider the housing
19:16
development fund. Uh but for instance,
19:18
we have a Noah preservation um RFP that
19:22
will be posted like I said in July 1st.
19:24
And I think based on kind of what you're
19:26
indicating that may be um something you
19:29
may want to target and look at. But as I
19:32
mentioned, happy to chat with you
19:33
offline about this um and maybe
19:35
troubleshoot and make sure we're putting
19:37
you in the right the right lane in terms
19:39
of of pursuing city funding.
19:45
Eliza Hammond asks, "Would you send a
19:47
copy of this recording out to
19:49
participants?" We will um give us a
19:52
little bit of time. We'll take this
19:53
recording and post it on YouTube as well
19:56
as on our website. So yes, to answer
19:59
your question, uh we won't send it out
20:02
specifically or I guess we could
20:04
Michael, would you like to send that out
20:05
specifically to these this list? So So
20:08
what I'll do is um if you receive the
20:11
invite for this webinar, I will make a
20:13
note that once we have that posted on
20:15
our RFP landing page, I will send out a
20:17
notice to folks just to let them know
20:18
that it's been posted. Um, and it'll be
20:21
right there next to the RFP application
20:24
document. You'll see a link to the
20:25
recording and you can just click through
20:26
there. Perfect. Alexis Bostik asks, "So,
20:32
is it like having an lead
20:34
certification?"
20:38
Sorry, just taking a note there. Um,
20:40
yeah, similar, right? Yep. So, we're
20:42
looking at um sort of the we're working
20:44
with our our our colleagues over in the
20:48
um
20:51
uh strategic en the folks who are
20:52
overseeing the strategic energy action
20:54
plan. Working with them closely to sort
20:56
of build out this program and better
20:58
understand what it is that the market
21:00
can deliver. But something like a lead
21:02
certification would certainly uh be
21:04
something that we're driving towards. uh
21:07
not necessarily saying that you have to
21:08
pursue that per se uh because I know
21:10
those certifications can be costly and
21:13
or or challenging to receive. Um but I'd
21:17
be happy to chat through what it is
21:18
you're looking at specifically.
21:22
Ada Esther Gil Gimenez asked, "Was this
21:26
meeting recorded by chance? I was just
21:28
able to join and missed everything."
21:30
Yes, it will. It is being recorded and
21:33
we will post uh the recording and
21:35
Michael will send out a uh followup to
21:38
let everyone know that this was posted.
21:41
Uh Tori Finster asks, "Is the
21:43
affordability restriction regarding 8%
21:46
AMI on home ownership tied to only to
21:49
initial qualification or is ongoing
21:51
compliance required during ownership?"
21:55
Yeah, so ongoing compliance is required.
21:57
Um I I would refer you to the RFP. I
22:00
don't have that information immediately
22:01
off the top of my head, but there is a
22:03
resale resale restriction and also a use
22:05
restriction, right? So, for instance, uh
22:08
if the home is um developed and then
22:11
purchased by an owner, it cannot then be
22:13
used for rental purposes, right? So, it
22:15
would have to be owner occupied. Uh and
22:17
there is a reseller restriction that
22:18
applies for I want to say 15 years um
22:23
for for home ownership developments. But
22:25
great question.
22:27
Okay, Tori Finster asks, "How is the
22:31
affordability bonus calculated and does
22:33
it increase funding allocation or
22:35
application score?"
22:38
Is this for the energy efficiency
22:39
question?
22:41
I believe so. Yeah, a great question.
22:44
So, that is one, like I said, that we're
22:46
we're still working through the um
22:50
scoring rubric, if you will, on that. um
22:53
will be finalized of course before any
22:55
awards are announced, but we're really
22:56
looking to better understand what the um
23:00
what the the possibilities are out there
23:02
and what folks are are exploring. So, um
23:06
if you have again any specific questions
23:08
about possible energy efficiency
23:10
upgrades you are looking to make, don't
23:12
hesitate to reach out. Um it's entirely
23:15
a a bonus. It is not a requirement of
23:17
the RFP. You are not excluded if you do
23:20
not apply for it by any means. um we are
23:22
really looking to pilot a new initiative
23:24
here and working with our development
23:25
partners and would welcome those
23:26
conversations. So don't hesitate to
23:28
reach out. Okay. I think that was in
23:31
relation to let's see um it said I was
23:35
referring to the affordable bonus in
23:37
section 8 actually. Section 8. Um, I'm
23:42
thinking that must be in reference to
23:48
I'm looking at the RFP right now under
23:50
section 8, which is the submission
23:51
instructions. Uh, okay. 7.2. Sorry, I
23:54
did see that pop up. Yeah. So, that's
23:56
the UDO. Um, so I would I would um if
23:59
you have questions about the UDO
24:00
specifically, um I'd be happy to connect
24:02
with my uh colleagues over in planning
24:05
to to chat through those. Um, but really
24:07
what you'd want to click through is that
24:09
link there that states that or I'm
24:11
sorry, it says more information and then
24:12
the Charlotte UDL u for any questions
24:15
relating to affordability bonuses. I
24:17
that is typically targeting um well I
24:21
won't say it it's inclusive of both
24:24
purely affordable developments but also
24:26
um mixed income developments as well.
24:31
Okay. Um, and I think Tori Fincher had a
24:35
follow-up question since you're on that
24:37
one. Will first-time affordable home
24:39
ownership developers be eligible?
24:42
Yeah, great question. U, so the answer
24:44
is yes. Uh, we welcome applications from
24:47
all. Um, but I will point you towards
24:50
the application requirements. So, we
24:52
would need to see demonstrated um or or
24:54
one of the evaluation criteria is
24:56
demonstrated uh capacity as well as
24:59
experience in affordable housing
25:00
development. if you don't have that or
25:03
are concerned about that um that
25:05
capacity andor experience um we're happy
25:09
to chat through that um and I I would
25:12
encourage you to reach out to me
25:13
directly.
25:16
Okay, Mike Carmichael asks, "As it comes
25:20
to ADUs, what does that look like when
25:22
it comes to large or small development
25:24
opportunities?"
25:27
Yeah, great question. So, ADUs. Um, so
25:30
we do have an ADU RFP. I'm not sure if
25:32
that has been posted yet or not, but it
25:34
is in the pipeline of of activities here
25:36
at the city. Um, it's a little outside
25:39
of this RFP, although not entirely,
25:42
right? So, if you're looking to do home
25:44
ownership development, which is
25:45
inclusive of ADUs, uh, that's certainly
25:47
a possibility and we would welcome that.
25:49
Um, but for for those types of
25:54
uh unique questions, again, I would
25:57
recommend you reach out to me directly
25:58
and we can chat through those just in to
26:00
determine eligibility. Uh, because
26:02
whenever we're talking about ADUs, we're
26:03
likely then talking about, you know,
26:04
rental uh, ADUs or being leveraged as
26:08
rental ADUs, which is certainly a
26:10
possibility. Uh but it would it would
26:12
require us to have some conversations
26:14
about what that would look like just to
26:15
ensure that it is an eligible activity
26:17
based on what it is you're looking to
26:18
do.
26:21
Alexis Bostic asks, "Will the permitting
26:24
process be priority for these projects?"
26:29
Yeah, great question. So, um permitting
26:32
typically, well, uh yeah, typically
26:34
occurs after the RFP, uh process and
26:37
awards are made. And so what I can tell
26:39
you is that the sketch plan review, we
26:40
do have set aside time with our friends
26:42
over at the development center to review
26:44
and respond to sketch plans, uh the
26:47
outcome of that review is sort of a
26:49
preliminary thumbs up or thumbs down of
26:51
whether or not this is viable based on
26:54
zoning regulations.
26:56
And so um in in that sense, yes, you do
26:59
get some prioritization there. Uh but in
27:01
terms of prioritization with permitting,
27:03
uh no, not per se. Um, I' I'd be happy
27:06
to reach out to or connect you with our
27:07
our our folks over in planning to to
27:09
better understand what that looks like.
27:11
Um, but it's a little outside of the
27:14
scope of the RFP, if you will.
27:21
Okay, that looks like all the questions.
27:25
Anyone else have any more questions?
27:31
folks a few minutes
27:34
and then while while we're just kind of
27:36
uh you know waiting for any questions to
27:37
come in, one thing I I did want to
27:39
follow up on is there was a question
27:40
about location. And so as part of the
27:42
RFP, one of the requirements is that you
27:44
submit something called your housing
27:46
locationational tool score. And so
27:48
that'll give you a good sense of um how
27:52
that location is looking in the eyes of
27:53
of city staff who are reviewing these
27:55
applications. So whenever you go into
27:57
that tool and enter the development data
27:59
that you're required to submit, it'll
28:02
generate some numbers for you that'll
28:04
indicate um you know how it scores. Uh
28:07
and so there's not really a
28:11
threshold that we're necessarily looking
28:12
at and it certainly depends on the
28:14
development type, but I would generally
28:15
say if you're scoring above 20, you're
28:18
likely in a priority area for the city.
28:20
And that's a composite of four different
28:22
measurements, each one on a 10-point
28:24
scale. So 40 possible points. Anything
28:28
above 20 typically, I won't say
28:30
universally because that's certainly not
28:32
the case, but typically if you're
28:33
scoring over 20, you likely fall in one
28:36
of the categories u that would be
28:38
considered for locationational
28:39
prioritization.
28:47
Excellent. I think that is it for the
28:50
questions. We didn't have any more come
28:52
in. Um,
28:55
I think we're good, Michael. Okay. Well,
28:57
very good. Well, um, I know I've said
28:59
this
29:00
repeatedly now, but if you have any
29:02
specific questions, I am more than happy
29:04
to chat with you. Please don't hesitate
29:06
to reach out. Uh, you can reach me via
29:08
email listed here. Um, and yeah, I'd be
29:12
happy to chat through any questions or
29:13
concerns you do have. So, don't feel
29:15
like this is the one-shot opportunity to
29:16
get those questions out. I know if
29:18
you're anything like me, you typically
29:19
think about things and 30 minutes later
29:21
the question pops into your head. So, uh
29:23
if you if you want to reach out, please
29:25
don't hesitate to do so. Happy to chat
29:27
with you. But otherwise, uh really
29:29
appreciate everyone joining today's call
29:31
and uh I will be on the lookout for any
29:33
emails and then applications. So, thanks
29:35
so much everybody.